Closed Campus?
North Platte Public Schools wants you to actually be in the school when you’re in school. That means staying at North Platte High School for lunch and out periods. Superintendent Dr. Ron Hanson discussed closing campus, or not allowing students to leave the school building until the end of the day, at the monthly Student Advisory Committee meeting on November 17. Hanson said the parking lots are dangerous, sophomores and freshmen leave for lunch, and some students are leaving to abuse drugs during their non-school time. Student advisors thought that out periods were a way around taking harder classes. Principal James Ayres said a closed campus would result in shorter lunch periods but more lunches. The students thought that closing the campus would be a difficult transition.
When asked about students abusing drugs during their out periods and lunch, Ayres said “That’s one of the things we have to consider when talking about this. I’m not a fool, I wasn’t born yesterday. Obviously I know there’s kids that leave, and it’s not necessarily alcohol, there’s probably some that do that, but I think it’s more marijuana, pills, or whatever else. They leave campus and do what they do and then they come back. Alcohol is a little different because of the way they behave, but with marijuana and pills, we kind of get tipped off to it. I don’t think it’s any different now than it was 10 years ago.”
Many freshmen and sophomores currently leave for lunch. Freshman Logan Way said that he leaves every day. “There’s no one out there to see who’s leaving. It’s pretty easy just to walk out.” When he was asked what he would do if they started enforcing the rule, so that freshmen and sophomores couldn’t leave, he said, “I would get rather angry and just do it anyway.” Later, when asked what he would do if they closed campus completely, he said, “I would probably protest or boycott the situation.”
In 1998-2002 you would’ve seen student Emily Hasenauer, now a current NPHS math teacher, skipping her lunches. She is against open lunches. She said, “I think that if freshmen and sophomores respected the fact that they would be able to have an open lunch when they were juniors and seniors, and chose not to skip lunch as often as they do, then it wouldn’t be an issue.” However, she said there are positive aspects of open campus, such as, time management, getting a chance to refocus after a break, more lunch options, opportunities to work or job shadow, and we have less congested lunches at school.”
Many people believe that students should have to earn an out periods. Ayres said, “They used to tie honor passes to NeSa test scores, but sometimes students aren’t very good test takers, and just because they didn’t pass the NeSa test doesn’t mean they’re not good students. We kind of look at the students that are on track to graduate, if they have plenty of credits and are going to graduate, other than English 12 and American government, then we give those students honor passes.”
Freshman Drake Berry said, “I personally believe that closed campuses are more safe and that it provides more learning benefits to students and it provides a more streamlined experience for students.”
Ayres said, “You have the ability to come late to class or leave early, if you abuse the honor pass, like you come back tardy or skip classes, the honor pass can be taken away at any time.”
Class of 2019.
Ainsley • Jan 8, 2016 at 11:31 PM
Closed campus during lunch would be awful. The cafeteria is already crowded and extremely loud, and adding all the students who leave for lunch to that would just make it 10x worse. Not only that, but a lot of students enjoy that time to do something with. They get to leave and get some air and eat some good food and maybe just sit at home for a bit in the middle of the day. As for the kids who do leave to do stupid stuff, I understand why people want the campus closed. But is it fair to punish the majority of students for a small number of other students choices? I don’t think it is. Both my siblings had open campus for all 4 of their years, and I think it should stay that way.
Caiden Modlin • Jan 6, 2016 at 12:20 PM
I think that just because that some kids do go out and do that stuff I don’t think that you should have a closed campus for the people who are actually good. Because kids that don’t do that they love having lunches out and maybe going home for a little while. But if people are out smoking or drinking and stuff then make sure that they are going out for the reason to go out to lunch and stuff. And the kids who aren’t doing that shouldn’t be punished for what other kids choose to do.
Sumar Mathews • Jan 6, 2016 at 12:03 PM
i think that if you are able to drive then you’re able to leave.
Haley Ablard • Jan 6, 2016 at 12:02 PM
I think this made some people aware of the mistakes they’re making and what might happen if they don’t stop. In my opinion, open campus is a good thing, but it’s being taken advantage of.
Kaytlynn • Jan 6, 2016 at 11:59 AM
Making NPHS a closed campus sounds ridiculous. Kids will leave anyways. Kids are still going to come to school high or drunk, not being able to leave isn’t going to change that. Having a closed campus might lead to having more drugs done in school. Lunch periods will be shorter and for all students without an out period that’s really the only break they get from thinking. They’ll be less efficient in the nest class because they didn’t get enough time to relax and re-focus
Autumn Brinker • Jan 6, 2016 at 11:50 AM
I think they shouldn’t close campus because some people need this time to be outside and get some fresh air. I think it should be open to everybody because some people from all grades don’t really like what the food is that the school provides and they don’t have the food or time to make a lunch to take to school.
Tom Johns • Dec 14, 2015 at 11:36 AM
I graduated from NPHS in 1962. We had a closed campus at that time and we were assigned a numbered parking space in a fenced and locked parking lot. Did I like it? NO!! Did we find ways to circumvent the system? YES11
Amber Dunham • Dec 4, 2015 at 5:30 PM
I believe that being able to leave the grounds for lunch is a good thing. Trying to take it away from us would be disastrous. Some kids leave every single day because they hate the food at school and would rather eat elsewhere. And honestly i dont blame them. Lunch is our break period where we finally get a chance to calm down and get away. Most kids hate the school and cooping them up in it for 8 hours would probably just make the violence between students worse. There are three lunch periods and during all these lunches the cafeteria is already almost full. If you keep the rest of the students at the school then the lunches would be over crouded and there wouldnt be room for a lot of kids to sit. DONT TAKE AWAT OPEN CAMPUS LUNCHES!!
Brianna Taylor • Dec 4, 2015 at 1:03 PM
I believe that the students that don’t do anything but eat outside are fine, It allows those students to relax to the sound of quiet other than sitting in a loud lunch room with screaming kids. The students that decide to go out and do drugs or something need to be watched, the best that the teachers can do is to sit outside and watch everyone who happens to be outside. I think that can help instead of just closing campus because that can cause students to be angry and speak their minds. Of corse the schools don’t like students doing that now do they.
Shawn Baggett • Dec 4, 2015 at 1:00 PM
I believe the kids that are leaving for lunch or during the out periods to “abuse drugs” are going to leave anyways, even if the rules changed to a closed campus. With an open campus it at least gives freedom to the kids that don’t want to eat the schools bland and revolting lunch that is provided for us. With a closed campus it would be that much more like a penitentiary, forcing us to stay within our boundaries and either forced to partake in the slop the school provides or go hungry. Stick with the open campus if you don’t want kids to start revolting more than they already do.
CrystalRose Renteria • Dec 4, 2015 at 12:59 PM
I think that students that don’t do anything bad and are good kids shouldn’t have to be punished for what other students are doing. Some kids use it as a way to relieve stress from through out the day and just want to enjoy outside while they eat their lunch. My opinion is that just because some students do that doesn’t mean they have to punish all the students.